Program
World
Arts Therapies
SUPERVISION SUMMIT
Write your awesome label here.
Integral Parts of a Whole: El Duende One-Canvas Process Painting as an Art-Based Supervision Practice
This didactic and experiential presentation delves into the five fluid phases of el Duende process painting (EDPP) as an art-based supervision practice (warm-up, depth re-working on one canvas over time, sequential photographing, journaling and peer feedback loops, final compilation video). Attention focuses on developing self-reflexivity, risk taking, and the importance of material choices. The intentions and foci of attention for each phase is enhanced by exploring material choices through the lens of the Expressive Therapies Continuum’s framework. Three core elements of transformational learning (normative, formative, and restorative) highlight how the one-canvas model of supervision develops critical thinking while engaged in art making. We will explore how the parts of the whole EDPP method are integral as they blend didactic theory with experiential learning, respecting a cyclical process of artmaking, growth, and discovery.
Learning Objectives:
By the end of this presentation, the participants will be able to:
1. Process and product in an art-based supervision, identifying the 5 phases of EDPP (warm-up; entry into art making with re-working with photographing; pause for journaling & feedback loops; final compilation video) as they align with intentions of transformational learning (normative, formative, restorative).
2. Identify ways the Expressive Therapies Continuum (ETC) scaffolds an art-based supervision that includes assemblage materials and paints, while participating in the EDPP Cycle of Layering.
3. Examine layering processes, feedback loops, photographing evolution, and reflective journaling (core elements of EDPP) as they enhance reflexivity, risk-taking, and reflection.
Learning Objectives:
By the end of this presentation, the participants will be able to:
1. Process and product in an art-based supervision, identifying the 5 phases of EDPP (warm-up; entry into art making with re-working with photographing; pause for journaling & feedback loops; final compilation video) as they align with intentions of transformational learning (normative, formative, restorative).
2. Identify ways the Expressive Therapies Continuum (ETC) scaffolds an art-based supervision that includes assemblage materials and paints, while participating in the EDPP Cycle of Layering.
3. Examine layering processes, feedback loops, photographing evolution, and reflective journaling (core elements of EDPP) as they enhance reflexivity, risk-taking, and reflection.
Write your awesome label here.
Dr. Abbe Miller, ATR-BC, LPC, AATCE
From Reflection to Evaluation: Developing a Supervision Methodology in Music Therapy
Supervision is a fundamental component of professional development and clinical practice in the arts therapies. However, there is still a need to develop and evaluate methodologies that make the processes involved in supervision explicit and systematic, particularly in complex clinical contexts.
In a study published (Marsimian, 2024), the author presented a supervision methodology developed through clinical practice with music therapists working with people on the autism spectrum, identifying recurring aspects of the supervision process and proposing guidelines for its organization.
The present study represents a second stage in this process and aims to explore and evaluate the methodology from the perspective of participating music therapists. It examines their perceptions of the structure and relevance of supervision, as well as its contribution to reflection on practice and professional development.
The presentation will bring both studies together to illustrate the progression from an experience and reflection based approach toward a systematized methodology that is subsequently evaluated. Methodological and ethical challenges involved in researching a supervision methodology developed by the supervisor herself will also be discussed, emphasizing the importance of reflexivity and transparency regarding the researcher-practitioner position.
Although the work originates in music therapy and the context of autism, it raises a broader question for the arts therapies: How can supervision maintain its relational and reflective nature while also becoming sufficiently structured to be systematically evaluated, communicated, and adapted to other professional contexts?
Keywords
Supervision; Arts Therapies; Music Therapy; reflective practice; professional development; autism; supervision methodology.
Learning Objectives
At the end of this presentation, the participants will be able to:
1. Analyse the development of a supervision methodology in music therapy, from its practice and reflection based origins (Marsimian, 2024) to its systematization and evaluation.
2. Explore the findings of the methodology’s evaluation from the perspective of participating music therapists, focusing on its contribution to reflection on practice and professional development.
3. Reflect on the challenges and possibilities of systematizing and evaluating supervision methodologies in the arts therapies, while preserving their relational, contextual and reflective nature.
References
Marsimian, N. I. A. (2024). Reflections on supervision in music therapy in the context of autism. Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.15845/voices.v24i2.3731
In a study published (Marsimian, 2024), the author presented a supervision methodology developed through clinical practice with music therapists working with people on the autism spectrum, identifying recurring aspects of the supervision process and proposing guidelines for its organization.
The present study represents a second stage in this process and aims to explore and evaluate the methodology from the perspective of participating music therapists. It examines their perceptions of the structure and relevance of supervision, as well as its contribution to reflection on practice and professional development.
The presentation will bring both studies together to illustrate the progression from an experience and reflection based approach toward a systematized methodology that is subsequently evaluated. Methodological and ethical challenges involved in researching a supervision methodology developed by the supervisor herself will also be discussed, emphasizing the importance of reflexivity and transparency regarding the researcher-practitioner position.
Although the work originates in music therapy and the context of autism, it raises a broader question for the arts therapies: How can supervision maintain its relational and reflective nature while also becoming sufficiently structured to be systematically evaluated, communicated, and adapted to other professional contexts?
Keywords
Supervision; Arts Therapies; Music Therapy; reflective practice; professional development; autism; supervision methodology.
Learning Objectives
At the end of this presentation, the participants will be able to:
1. Analyse the development of a supervision methodology in music therapy, from its practice and reflection based origins (Marsimian, 2024) to its systematization and evaluation.
2. Explore the findings of the methodology’s evaluation from the perspective of participating music therapists, focusing on its contribution to reflection on practice and professional development.
3. Reflect on the challenges and possibilities of systematizing and evaluating supervision methodologies in the arts therapies, while preserving their relational, contextual and reflective nature.
References
Marsimian, N. I. A. (2024). Reflections on supervision in music therapy in the context of autism. Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.15845/voices.v24i2.3731
Write your awesome label here.
Nuria Marsimian
Poster Presentations
Poster presentations will happen in-person during lunch break and also recorded videos will be presented on the screen during the break. You will have time to meet the presenters and listen to their research and reflexive practices.
Write your awesome label here.
Moving, Dancing and Writing in Clinical Supervision: Employing Embodied
Practices in Clinical Supervision
At times, clinical supervision can be a highly intellectual and verbal process, “talking through” difficult issues but leaving aside our lived experience and the bodily reactions triggered by a particular client or situation. Drawing on the conception of an embodied mind and embodied cognition, this presentation introduces new ways of self-examination in clinical supervision. These approaches integrate the body and its inherent knowledge, as well as movement and the written word, into the psychotherapy process of supervision.
Making a rigorous distinction between knowledge derived by language and knowledge derived by the body without the intervention of conscious thought, you will learn about different models for supervision: Self-Supervision, Peer Supervision, and Group Supervision. All of these models incorporate the methodology from Panhofer’s (2011) Writing – Moving – Writing study, inviting therapists and supervisors from Dance Movement Therapy, body psychotherapies, narrative and other arts therapies, —as well as verbal therapies—to inquire into the connections between embodied experience and the embodied word. This exploration aims to investigate the intercorporeal perspective of the therapeutic relationship, deepening the clinical work and the relationships with the clients.
Please ensure you attend from a private, safe space that allows for some movement (e.g., having approximately 4 m² of room for movement near your computer).
References: Panhofer, H. (2011). Dancing, moving and writing in clinical supervision? Employing embodied practices in psychotherapy supervision. The Arts in Psychotherapy 38 (2011) 9–16. doi:10.1016/j.aip.2010.10.001
Learning Objectives:
By the end of this presentation, the participants will be able to:
1. Differentiate two forms of knowledge in supervision: knowledge mediated through language and conscious reflection, and knowledge emerging through embodied experience and bodily awareness.
2. Describe three supervision models—self-supervision, peer supervision, and group supervision—and explain how embodied practices can be integrated into each.
3. Apply the Writing–Moving–Writing method to a clinical or supervisory experience and identify at least two insights related to bodily responses, intercorporeality, or the therapeutic relationship.
Making a rigorous distinction between knowledge derived by language and knowledge derived by the body without the intervention of conscious thought, you will learn about different models for supervision: Self-Supervision, Peer Supervision, and Group Supervision. All of these models incorporate the methodology from Panhofer’s (2011) Writing – Moving – Writing study, inviting therapists and supervisors from Dance Movement Therapy, body psychotherapies, narrative and other arts therapies, —as well as verbal therapies—to inquire into the connections between embodied experience and the embodied word. This exploration aims to investigate the intercorporeal perspective of the therapeutic relationship, deepening the clinical work and the relationships with the clients.
Please ensure you attend from a private, safe space that allows for some movement (e.g., having approximately 4 m² of room for movement near your computer).
References: Panhofer, H. (2011). Dancing, moving and writing in clinical supervision? Employing embodied practices in psychotherapy supervision. The Arts in Psychotherapy 38 (2011) 9–16. doi:10.1016/j.aip.2010.10.001
Learning Objectives:
By the end of this presentation, the participants will be able to:
1. Differentiate two forms of knowledge in supervision: knowledge mediated through language and conscious reflection, and knowledge emerging through embodied experience and bodily awareness.
2. Describe three supervision models—self-supervision, peer supervision, and group supervision—and explain how embodied practices can be integrated into each.
3. Apply the Writing–Moving–Writing method to a clinical or supervisory experience and identify at least two insights related to bodily responses, intercorporeality, or the therapeutic relationship.
Write your awesome label here.
Dr. Heidrun Panhofer, MA DMT
Write your awesome label here.
Lisa Hinz, Ph.D, ATR-BC
Write your awesome label here.
Maria Riccardi, Ph.D, ATR-BC, c.o.
Response Art in Art-Based Supervision
Response art is art that is created by art therapists to contain, explore and communicate about their work. These images can be brief sketches, made in one sitting, or more evolved work created over time. Response art may be produced before, during, or after session. When it is made by the supervisee or supervisor and explored in supervision, it becomes an essential component of the supervisory dialogue, accessing and helping to communicate countertransference and other aspects of treatment that are beyond our conscious awareness.
Harm’s touch is an original concept that reframes the complex effects of witnessing as an opportunity for professional and personal growth. As opposed to vicarious trauma, which implies pathology, harm’s touch is a portal for empathy. Response art is a valuable practice when used to help therapists manage and learn from harm’s touch.
This presentation will demonstrate some of the uses of response art in art-based supervision during both in person and distance sessions. This valuable resource augments verbal discussion as we strive to conceptualize treatment and guide new therapists in competent, ethical practice. By making response art to investigate issues that arise in therapy, we engage creativity and imagination as tools to promote clarity of purpose. This brings authenticity to our work.
Learning Objectives:
At the end of this presentation, participants will be able to:
1. Define response art as it is used in art therapy.
2. Describe two ways to use images, made as response art, in art-based supervision.
3. Describe how countertransference may be explored through response art.
Harm’s touch is an original concept that reframes the complex effects of witnessing as an opportunity for professional and personal growth. As opposed to vicarious trauma, which implies pathology, harm’s touch is a portal for empathy. Response art is a valuable practice when used to help therapists manage and learn from harm’s touch.
This presentation will demonstrate some of the uses of response art in art-based supervision during both in person and distance sessions. This valuable resource augments verbal discussion as we strive to conceptualize treatment and guide new therapists in competent, ethical practice. By making response art to investigate issues that arise in therapy, we engage creativity and imagination as tools to promote clarity of purpose. This brings authenticity to our work.
Learning Objectives:
At the end of this presentation, participants will be able to:
1. Define response art as it is used in art therapy.
2. Describe two ways to use images, made as response art, in art-based supervision.
3. Describe how countertransference may be explored through response art.
Write your awesome label here.
Barbara Fish, Ph.D., HLM
Integrating Radical Imagination into Arts-Based Supervision
Write your awesome label here.
Monica Carpendale, BFA, DVATI, RCAT, BCATR, HLM
Anti-Oppressive Supervision: Noticing the Invisible Forces Together
As creative arts therapies continue to expand to different parts of the world, it becomes increasingly important for practitioners to understand how cultural contexts and power dynamics impact supervisory and therapeutic relationships. In this workshop, we will identify the differences between anti-oppressive practice and multicultural practice, expand our understanding of how to create a sense of safety among people whose backgrounds and identities differ widely, and explore ways to reduce instances of oppression in supervision and therapy sessions. The workshop will also include a discussion of how we can leverage the power of artistic expression to explore and support anti-oppressive practice in supervision.
Learning Objectives:
By the end of the presentation, the participants will be able to:
1. Define what anti-oppressive practice is and what isn’t.
2. Identify 5 core principles of anti-oppressive supervision
3. Learn 2 different ways to use art making as a way to engage supervisees into the anti-oppressive framework.
Learning Objectives:
By the end of the presentation, the participants will be able to:
1. Define what anti-oppressive practice is and what isn’t.
2. Identify 5 core principles of anti-oppressive supervision
3. Learn 2 different ways to use art making as a way to engage supervisees into the anti-oppressive framework.
Write your awesome label here.
Miki Nishida Goerdt, LCSW, LCSW-C, ATR-BC
Write your awesome label here.
Tsz Yan Winnie Wong, LCPC, ATR-BC
The Contribution of Dramatherapy Supervisors to Supervision in Education
Write your awesome label here.
Lisa Lea-Weston
Write your awesome label here.
Mary Ann Hunter, Ph.D.
Interactive Drawing Therapy: A Backbone for Art Therapy Supervision and Practice?
This presentation is an introduction to Interactive Drawing Therapy (IDT), a unique counselling ‘tool’ that works with words, images and feelings/behaviour. Some IDT basic principles are similar to art therapy but some aspects differ significantly. IDT was developed in New Zealand before it came to Australia and has a growing
interest of practitioners. In IDT, the drawing becomes a mirror for the client, helping them see themselves from a new perspective that facilitates insight, inner resourcefulness and change. IDT is used to facilitate supervision as a quick, effective method for supervisees to clarify and process difficult impasses in their
practice often linked to countertransference issues. IDT assists clients to express themselves and move from surface issues to deeper layers and feelings through the focus and use of client generated metaphors. In IDT the therapist formulates drawing
cues from what is said so words are a significant component of the method. IDT works with metaphor and symbol as they are determined by the client when working at depth. IDT incorporates drawing methods safely and respectfully into clinical practice frameworks and can also be used adjunctive to other theoretical
approaches. Different drawings appear at different stages of the therapeutic process.
The concept of ‘levels of change’ help establish where the client is and facilitates the client to reveal themselves to themselves. IDT provides a structured method of drawing use that contributes to its popularity and effectiveness. In short, IDT provides a backbone for clinical use of drawings that enhances clinical best practice,
ongoing professional development and clinical supervision.
Learning Objectives:
By the end of the presentation, the participants will be able to:
1. Apply Interactive Drawing Therapy(IDT) in their practice
2. Examine similarities and differences with art therapy ethical practice;
3. Explore IDT principals and integration into clinical supervision.
interest of practitioners. In IDT, the drawing becomes a mirror for the client, helping them see themselves from a new perspective that facilitates insight, inner resourcefulness and change. IDT is used to facilitate supervision as a quick, effective method for supervisees to clarify and process difficult impasses in their
practice often linked to countertransference issues. IDT assists clients to express themselves and move from surface issues to deeper layers and feelings through the focus and use of client generated metaphors. In IDT the therapist formulates drawing
cues from what is said so words are a significant component of the method. IDT works with metaphor and symbol as they are determined by the client when working at depth. IDT incorporates drawing methods safely and respectfully into clinical practice frameworks and can also be used adjunctive to other theoretical
approaches. Different drawings appear at different stages of the therapeutic process.
The concept of ‘levels of change’ help establish where the client is and facilitates the client to reveal themselves to themselves. IDT provides a structured method of drawing use that contributes to its popularity and effectiveness. In short, IDT provides a backbone for clinical use of drawings that enhances clinical best practice,
ongoing professional development and clinical supervision.
Learning Objectives:
By the end of the presentation, the participants will be able to:
1. Apply Interactive Drawing Therapy(IDT) in their practice
2. Examine similarities and differences with art therapy ethical practice;
3. Explore IDT principals and integration into clinical supervision.
Write your awesome label here.
Annette Coulter, MA, AThR, PACFA
Community and Arts-Based Supervision: A Holistic, Co-Held, Creative Space
This presentation explores community and arts-based supervision as a holistic, relational, and creative space for professional reflection and growth. Moving beyond supervision centred primarily on verbal case discussion, the approach invites image-making, metaphor, embodied awareness, and creative process as ways of accessing multiple meanings and deepening reflection on therapeutic work. Particular attention is given to creating a strength-based and supportive supervisory environment that nurtures professional confidence, self-trust, curiosity, and the supervisee’s own voice, intention, and instinct.
Drawing on experiences of individual, group, and community-based supervision, the presentation considers supervision as a shared space in which uncertainty can be held rather than immediately resolved. Arts-based exploration can support externalization, perspective-taking, creative problem solving, and awareness of relational and emotional processes that may be difficult to articulate verbally. The community dimension further emphasizes reciprocity, shared creativity, co-regulation, and the resources that emerge through connection with others. Together, these perspectives invite supervisors to cultivate a reflective and nourishing space that supports both clinical responsibility and the ongoing development and well-being of the therapist.
Learning Objectives:
By the end of the presentation, the participants will be able to:
1. Identify at least three principles of community and arts-based supervision, including strength-based practice, shared creativity, and reflective use of metaphor or image.
2. Describe two ways arts-based supervision can support perspective-taking, self-awareness, or exploration of complex clinical material.
3. Apply one arts-based or community-oriented supervision strategy to a community supervision scenario.
Drawing on experiences of individual, group, and community-based supervision, the presentation considers supervision as a shared space in which uncertainty can be held rather than immediately resolved. Arts-based exploration can support externalization, perspective-taking, creative problem solving, and awareness of relational and emotional processes that may be difficult to articulate verbally. The community dimension further emphasizes reciprocity, shared creativity, co-regulation, and the resources that emerge through connection with others. Together, these perspectives invite supervisors to cultivate a reflective and nourishing space that supports both clinical responsibility and the ongoing development and well-being of the therapist.
Learning Objectives:
By the end of the presentation, the participants will be able to:
1. Identify at least three principles of community and arts-based supervision, including strength-based practice, shared creativity, and reflective use of metaphor or image.
2. Describe two ways arts-based supervision can support perspective-taking, self-awareness, or exploration of complex clinical material.
3. Apply one arts-based or community-oriented supervision strategy to a community supervision scenario.
Write your awesome label here.
Lindsay Clarke, MA, ATR, RCAT, CCC
Write your awesome label here.
Carmen Oprea, MA, MFA, ATR-BC, RCAT
Round Table: Arts-Based Supervision
Write your awesome label here.
Panelists TBD
Write your awesome label here.
Cathy Malchiodi, PhD
Write your awesome label here.
